Libreria

I Tuoi Libri a Portata di Click

Home / Libreria / Filosofia / Saggio / WHITE SOUND. The vision of Silence into the public space

WHITE SOUND. The vision of Silence into the public space

3,00 10,00 

The book frames Cage’s visual and musical indeterminate compositions into the contemporary transformation of values and certainties about the definition of “author”, “tradition”, “style” and “finished opera”…

ISBN 978-88-99509-10-1 Categorie: ,

Sinossi

The book frames Cage’s visual and musical indeterminate compositions into the contemporary transformation of values and certainties about the definition of “author”, “tradition”, “style” and “finished opera”. The aim of this work is to highlight the relevance of Cage’s poetic into an ethic perspective, through the comparison with other artists (Rauschenberg, Duchamp, Cunningham) and the Zen theory about impermanence and void.

80

Formato

Cartaceo (Libro), Digitale (File formato PDF)

Claudia Landolfi is the author of books and essays on modern and contemporary Western philosophy with a particular focus on the subjectivation processes in the neoliberal digital apparatuses which restructure the relation between nature and culture, desire and power. She is working out a theory on the subjectivity defining concepts as: ‘governamentalization of emotions’ in digital media, ‘digital shrift’, ‘psychic enclosure’,‘informational matter’, ‘legal principle of subjectivation’. Psychic enclosure is represented by the formulation of a judgmental internalized norm which regulates the emotions and which is activated by digital media’s apparatuses, thus producing the moralized-judgmental subject in digital media ‘court’ over the affective and informational matter which is the singularity in its desiring facets. The internalized judgment is an extension of the apparatus of control (as self-control), thus digital media’s function is understood not only as spectacularization and control but also as a court finalized to the inclusion of people adopting the dominant anthropological model (the judge who works for capitalist production) and to the exclusion of the unproductive differences. The difference is not in the multiplication of tastes and orientations as such but is the non-judgmental and evenimential multiplicity. Her research on the affect and affection tends to open the subjective potential subtracting it to the judgment. Her aim is to propose an Ethics of Affect on an Empiricist basis, stressing the concepts of imagination, indetermination and invention, criticizing the cause-effect law and the anthropological paradigm which she calls ‘the legal subject’.